2.3 Direct factors affecting attractiveness 

The data in Table 11 shows that teachers put “television lacks expression” in first place; on the other hand, students rank lack of relevance as the primary factor.

Table 11: Direct factors affecting the attractiveness of teaching videos

 

Teachers

Students

Frequency

Percentage

Frequency

Percentage

Outdated content

94

12.5%

586

24.2%

Lack of relevance

171

22.8%

1066

44.1%

Simple presentation methods

187

24.9%

449

18.6%

Television lacks expression

262

34.9%

201

8.3%

Other

20

2.7%

87

3.6%

No information

17

2.3%

30

1.2%

Total

751

100%

2419

100% 

3. Strategies to Enhance Attractiveness

3.1 Selection of teaching content 

Most of the teachers and students believe that teaching videos should place more stress on teaching important or difficult points (see Table 12).

Table 12: How do the teachers and students choose teaching videos?

 

Teachers

Students

Frequency

Percentage

Frequency

Percentage

Systematic teaching

172

22.9%

605

25.0%

Important or difficult points

588

78.3%

1396

57.7%

Summary and guidance of course content

339

45.1%

505

20.9%

Extension of course content

276

36.8%

395

16.3%

Other

9

1.2%

128

5.3% 

3.2 The types of teaching videos selected 

The data in Table 13 shows that nearly three quarters of the teachers and more than half of the students prefer programmes like “CCTV Lecture Room”.

Table 13: The types of teaching videos selected by the teachers and students 

 

Teachers

Students

Frequency

Percentage

Frequency

Percentage

Lecture Room

543

72.3%

1301

53.8%

Spoon-feeding  method 

26

3.5%

498

20.6%

Interview

216

28.8%

533

22.3%

Panel discussion

158

21.0%

312

12.9%

Feature film

374

49.8%

450

18.6%

Other

23

3.1%

400

16.5%

3.3 Preference for lecturers

The teachers prefer ordinary teachers who are good at lecturing and specialists from open universities who are influential in this subject. On the other hand, the students prefer high-level or influential specialists in the subject to give lectures. See Table 14. 

Table 14: Preference for video lecturer among the teachers and students 

 

Teachers

Students

Frequency

Percentage

Frequency

Percentage

Top-level specialist in the subject

200

26.6%

840

34.7%

TV presenter good at lecturing

119

15.8%

631

26.1%

Influential specialist in the subject

368

49.0%

826

34.1%

TV presenter cooperating with specialist

226

30.1%

354

14.3%

Ordinary RTVU teacher with good teaching skills

381

50.7%

714

29.5%

No preference

21

2.8%

252

8.7%

Other

8

1.1%

244

10.1%